tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-840101833629300772.post2643885389195258941..comments2022-11-06T08:32:45.003-07:00Comments on Knowledge Is Not Very Far: Is God just a delusion? First Meeting NotesJakehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11983756506523132443noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-840101833629300772.post-30382206899751774152010-02-22T23:48:36.104-07:002010-02-22T23:48:36.104-07:00Jake
It is a problem with religion, as it transla...Jake<br /><br />It is a problem with religion, as it translates into law - and that is a part of what we atheists have against religion.<br /><br />Dawkins' arguments against religion aren't all that novel or new. They are actually just refutations of the most common arguments we come across, and they are refutations atheists have been making themselves for millenia.<br /><br />The most Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-840101833629300772.post-29311987530184350882010-02-20T09:35:13.226-07:002010-02-20T09:35:13.226-07:00So is that a problem with religion, or the law?So is that a problem with religion, or the law?Jakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11983756506523132443noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-840101833629300772.post-28229871500004224862010-02-20T03:27:24.372-07:002010-02-20T03:27:24.372-07:006. It was brought up that the examples that Dawkin...<i>6. It was brought up that the examples that Dawkins uses aren't normal, and are even in some cases "weird," so the conclusions aren't logically valid. In order for the conclusion to hold, it has to hold in all cases, not just in some special cases. </i><br /><br />On what grounds do they say that? That religious respect can have strange effects doesn't exactly speak Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com